An argument against active euthanasia from the religious perspective

Euthanasia and assisted suicide are matters of public concern because they involve one person facilitating the death of another. But this does not give us a passive role - we are called to be salt and light. Prepare to educate others on this important issue.

We concluded that it was virtually impossible to ensure that all acts of euthanasia were truly voluntary and that any liberalisation of the law in the United Kingdom could not be abused.

God is sovereign over life and death: Is it normal for terminally ill patients to desire death? Life is a gift from God.

Alternative treatments are available, such as palliative care and hospices. By any sane reckoning this should count as institutional cruelty, yet rulings like this happen all the time.

Prevalence of depression in the terminally ill: Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide: True compassion leads to sharing another's pain; it does not kill the person whose suffering we cannot bear. It is wrong ethical methodology to build an ethical doctrine on a few problem cases.

Footnotes Conflict of Interest: The Christian World View The underlying principles of our society were once based on the Biblical world view; indeed, western culture and our legal system were founded on it.

The main point of life is to glorify, enjoy, and serve the living God, and a primary feature of a life well lived is morality. Rather, it is a metaphysical concept that grounds both biological functions and moral intuitions.

Basic Arguments About Euthanasia

But what is said about them could be equally applied to air. Are terminally-ill people really in a position to make such a choice? Cases can be set up where these factors do not obtain: The Bible is clear on this. A second physician must be consulted and must concur with the decision to assist in ending the patient's life.

The bench in turn would appoint a committee of at least three renowned doctors to advise them on the matter. Some manners of life are morally appropriate for humans and others are not. However, perhaps the most compelling and clinically relevant mental health issues in palliative care today concern the desire for death and physician-assisted suicide PAS and their relationship to depression.

Because we are no longer dealing with an object that has the relevant rights. The major factors that determined the attitude included deeply held moral values like role of physician is to preserve life, PAS would pressurize for improved palliative care, religious beliefs, and diversion of resources from palliative care.

Basic Arguments About Euthanasia

In the s it evolved to refer to the welfare of the individual, where it was used to refer to such things as level of satisfaction, contentment, happiness, social harmony, and fulfilment. This would especially affect people who are disabled, elderly, sick or depressed.

Before we consider these, let us briefly examine arguments three, four, and five. Praeger Books,chapter 3. The modern secular world view has abandoned the doctrine of the image of God in man.

But such a death need not be directly intended as a final end for the person or as an immediately caused means to some end e. Libertarian advocates violate this principle by placing too much weight on an argument that applies only to a small number of situations.

In a state of total isolation, cut off from every source of life and affection, they would see death as the only liberation open to them. Passive euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible.

Until we make up our minds, that suffering will continue. Their actions may be identical at the level of means-to-ends, but their intents were different. Traditional Hindu views and the contemporary debate.

Fear and anxiety would be promoted rather than Individual autonomy. Suicide in cancer patients. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: For the vast majority of patients, such a recovery is less likely than winning the lottery and getting struck by lightning in the same afternoon.

Arguments For and Against Euthanasia

Why say 'No' to Euthanasia? The law is a powerful educator of public conscience.Christians are mostly against euthanasia. The arguments are usually based on the beliefs that life is given by God and that human beings are made in the image of God.

Life is a gift from God. All life is God-given. Birth and death are part of the life processes which God has created, so we should respect them. Proponents of euthanasia also criticize the “artificial and impractical” demarcation drawn by the court and the religious organizations between active and passive euthanasia.

Withdrawal of life support, the classical form of “passive” euthanasia, actually involves taking an. VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA: A UTILITARIAN PERSPECTIVE PETER SINGER ABSTRACT I can think of only one non-religious reason that has any plau-sibility at all, as a defence of the view that the boundary of our I will consider slippery slope arguments against allowing volun-tary euthanasia towards the end of this paper.

The argument says that there is no real difference between passive and active euthanasia, and so if we accept one, we should accept the other. Basic Arguments against Euthanasia Fear: Patients are vulnerable and fearful about the potential pain and deterioration ahead.

In our position paper, EUTHANASIA from an Islamic perspective, we are very clear that Active Euthanasia (giving lethal injection to end life Fair Use Policy; Help Centre; Notifications.

Arguments against permitting euthanasia and/or. and in religious arguments for or against assisted suicide it Protestant refusal to approve euthanasia is rooted in the biblical prohibition of murder, see Exodusand .

An argument against active euthanasia from the religious perspective
Rated 0/5 based on 42 review